Thursday, December 08, 2011

Neo-Darwinism, the Modern Synthesis and selfish genes: are they of use in physiology?

I like to open this blog with this deep and interesting reading from Denis Noble, the president of the IUPS, recently published on the Journal of Physiology.
Here is the abstract:

Neo-Darwinism, the Modern Synthesis and selfish genes: are they of use in physiology?:
This article argues that the gene-centric interpretations of evolution, and more particularly the selfish gene expression of those interpretations, form barriers to the integration of physiological science with evolutionary theory. A gene-centred approach analyses the relationships between genotypes and phenotypes in terms of differences (change the genotype and observe changes in phenotype). We now know that, most frequently, this does not correctly reveal the relationships because of extensive buffering by robust networks of interactions. By contrast, understanding biological function through physiological analysis requires an integrative approach in which the activity of the proteins and RNAs formed from each DNA template is analysed in networks of interactions. These networks also include components that are not specified by nuclear DNA. Inheritance is not through DNA sequences alone. The selfish gene idea is not useful in the physiological sciences, since selfishness cannot be defined as an intrinsic property of nucleotide sequences independently of gene frequency, i.e. the ‘success' in the gene pool that is supposed to be attributable to the ‘selfish' property. It is not a physiologically testable hypothesis.